Dr Thomas Armstrong talks about the difference in cultures between the West and East.
Western cultures are 'me' oriented and show a deep appreciation for individuality and uniqueness. Non-Western cultures are 'we' oriented where an individual is seen in the context of his culture, his tribe. In such cultures, 'me' is not appreciated as much as the person's ability to contextualize their lives into preset culture molds.
But what when there's no defined culture or tribe around you? Is this why inter-cultural/ inter-faith marriages are discouraged in India? Because it might alienate the couple and consequently their offspring?
I think cultural alienation is real. Being the product of a Hindu-Christian marriage, I don't relate to either in the context of cultural identity (not religious). Nor do my parents, I think, which is one of the biggest commonalities between them. Stereotyping is reductive, but it does present an honest (sometimes funny) picture of things.
Do I relate to Christian stereotypes? No. Do I relate to Hindu stereotypes? No.
Could this just be a thing among children of inter-faith, inter-language marriages? There's such a small 'we' due to the vast cultural difference that exists. Does this also contribute to existing cognitive difference?
Is easy relatability to culture traits early on in life an indicator of cognitive patterns?
No comments:
Post a Comment